DBC vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBC returned 8.54%/yr vs 43.95%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

DBC vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 44.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 8.54%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 43.95% annualized return.

DBC

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: 31.80%
• 6M: 32.21%
• 1Y: 40.70%
• 3Y*: 14.11%
• 5Y*: 12.01%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

TQQQ

• 1D: 4.41%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 44.91%
• 6M: 37.12%
• 1Y: 106.99%
• 3Y*: 62.78%
• 5Y*: 24.89%
• 10Y*: 43.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBC vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	31.80%	8.10%	2.18%	-6.19%	19.34%	41.36%	-7.84%	11.84%	-11.63%	4.86%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	44.91%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DBC and TQQQ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010	0.25

The correlation between DBC and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBC vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBC	TQQQ
Financial Services	91.5%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

DBC vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBC

DBC Risk / Return Rank: 75
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBC vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBC	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.16	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	2.45	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.33	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	2.91	+2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	9.45	+2.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBC vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBC and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBC	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.16	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.37	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.67	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.72	-0.61

Drawdowns

DBC vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBC	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.36%	-81.66%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	-36.97%	+29.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.82%	-58.04%	+44.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.34%	-81.66%	+54.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.71%	-81.66%	+39.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.76%	-12.55%	-11.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.21%	-18.52%	-27.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	11.36%	-7.97%

Volatility

DBC vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) is 6.20%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.84%. This indicates that DBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBC	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	20.84%	-14.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	39.54%	-23.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.91%	49.94%	-31.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.20%	66.84%	-47.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.82%	66.15%	-48.33%

DBC vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBC vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than TQQQ's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	2.53%	3.33%	5.22%	4.94%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	1.59%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.41%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBC and TQQQ in my portfolio?

DBC and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBC or TQQQ?

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to DBC (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, DBC or TQQQ?

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.95% vs 8.54% for DBC. On fees, DBC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DBC has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBC or TQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.95% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBC or TQQQ?

DBC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBC or TQQQ?

DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.

What is the main difference between DBC and TQQQ?

DBC is categorized as Commodities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.