PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBC vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBC vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 8.54%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.


DBC

1D
0.82%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
31.80%
6M
32.21%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
8.54%

SLV

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.66%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
16.83%
1Y
88.38%
3Y*
40.36%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBC vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
31.80%8.10%2.18%-6.19%19.34%41.36%-7.84%11.84%-11.63%4.86%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.41%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DBC and SLV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between DBC and SLV has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DBC vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBC
SLV

Financial Services

91.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DBC
91.5%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

DBC

-

SLV
100.0%

Communication Services

DBC

-

SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

DBC

-

SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

DBC

-

SLV

-

Energy

DBC

-

SLV

-

Healthcare

DBC

-

SLV

-

Industrials

DBC

-

SLV

-

Real Estate

DBC

-

SLV

-

Technology

DBC

-

SLV

-

Utilities

DBC

-

SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBC vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBC vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBCSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

2.09

+3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

4.40

+7.63

DBC vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBC and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBCSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.50

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.53

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.44

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.23

-0.12

Drawdowns

DBC vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.36%

-76.28%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-42.45%

+34.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-42.45%

+28.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-42.45%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

-42.81%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.76%

-41.69%

+17.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-44.67%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

20.15%

-16.76%

Volatility

DBC vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) is 6.20%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that DBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBCSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

16.89%

-10.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

58.88%

-42.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.91%

59.53%

-40.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

36.33%

-17.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

31.92%

-14.10%

DBC vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBC vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.53%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBC and SLV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to DBC (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 14.08% vs 8.54% for DBC. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBC has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

DBC is categorized as Commodities, while SLV is Silver. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.50% for SLV.

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBC and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer