PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBC vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBC vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly higher than PBP's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has outperformed PBP with an annualized return of 8.54%, while PBP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.06% annualized return.


DBC

1D
0.82%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
31.80%
6M
32.21%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
8.54%

PBP

1D
0.31%
1M
0.78%
YTD
4.30%
6M
5.70%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBC vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
31.80%8.10%2.18%-6.19%19.34%41.36%-7.84%11.84%-11.63%4.86%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.30%8.49%19.83%11.59%-11.82%19.97%-3.31%14.60%-5.57%11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DBC and PBP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.26

The correlation between DBC and PBP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBC vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBC
PBP

Financial Services

91.5%
11.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.5%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

DBC
91.5%
PBP
11.4%

Basic Materials

DBC

-

PBP
1.8%

Communication Services

DBC

-

PBP
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DBC

-

PBP
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

DBC

-

PBP
4.7%

Energy

DBC

-

PBP
3.3%

Healthcare

DBC

-

PBP
8.6%

Industrials

DBC

-

PBP
7.8%

Real Estate

DBC

-

PBP
1.8%

Technology

DBC

-

PBP
39.5%

Utilities

DBC

-

PBP
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBC vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBC vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBCPBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.55

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

3.29

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

17.37

-5.34

DBC vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBC and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBCPBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.48

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.34

-0.23

Drawdowns

DBC vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than PBP's maximum drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and PBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.36%

-43.43%

-32.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-5.22%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-15.42%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-18.61%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

-33.31%

-8.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.76%

-0.74%

-23.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-6.69%

-39.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

0.99%

+2.40%

Volatility

DBC vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 1.43%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBCPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

1.43%

+4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

5.62%

+10.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.91%

6.95%

+11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

11.87%

+7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

13.67%

+4.15%

DBC vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBC vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than PBP's 11.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.53%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.22%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBC and PBP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBC has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to PBP (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs PBP's -43.43%.

On 10-year performance, DBC leads with 8.54% vs 7.06% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBC has performed better with a 8.54% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 2.53% for DBC.

DBC is categorized as Commodities, while PBP is Derivative Income. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.29% for PBP.

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBC and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer