PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYBR vs. ESLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CYBR vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CYBR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESLT

1D
0.83%
1M
6.13%
YTD
43.85%
6M
71.50%
1Y
98.59%
3Y*
60.25%
5Y*
45.92%
10Y*
25.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBR vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
-8.34%33.89%52.09%68.95%-25.18%7.23%38.61%57.24%79.13%-9.03%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
43.85%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%34.77%-14.56%37.62%-13.22%32.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBR and ESLT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014

0.18

The correlation between CYBR and ESLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CYBR:

$20.69B

ESLT:

$39.95B

EPS

CYBR:

-$2.92

ESLT:

$12.36

PS Ratio

CYBR:

15.13

ESLT:

4.80

PB Ratio

CYBR:

8.61

ESLT:

9.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CYBR:

$1.36B

ESLT:

$8.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CYBR:

$1.01B

ESLT:

$2.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

CYBR:

$59.13M

ESLT:

$861.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYBR vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBR

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBR vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CYBR vs. ESLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CYBRESLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

Drawdowns

CYBR vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYBRESLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.14%

Volatility

CYBR vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYBRESLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.13%

Dividends

CYBR vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison

CYBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.37%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%

Financials

CYBR vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CyberArk Software Ltd. and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
372.65M
2.19B
(CYBR) Total Revenue
(ESLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CYBR vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CyberArk Software Ltd. and Elbit Systems Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
71.7%
25.2%
Portfolio components
CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CYBR and ESLT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYBR and ESLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer