CYBR vs. CLBT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CYBR (CyberArk Software Ltd.) and CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CYBR vs. CLBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CYBR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLBT

• 1D: -2.75%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: -25.51%
• 6M: -25.80%
• 1Y: -18.75%
• 3Y*: 29.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBR vs. CLBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd.	-8.34%	33.89%	52.09%	68.95%	-25.18%	3.18%
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.	-25.51%	-18.16%	154.39%	98.62%	-45.64%	-21.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBR and CLBT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2021	0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap CYBR : $20.69B CLBT : $3.39B
EPS CYBR : -$2.92 CLBT : $0.29
PS Ratio CYBR : 15.13 CLBT : 6.78
PB Ratio CYBR : 8.61 CLBT : 6.63
Total Revenue (TTM) CYBR : $1.36B CLBT : $496.43M
Gross Profit (TTM) CYBR : $1.01B CLBT : $416.33M
EBITDA (TTM) CYBR : $59.13M CLBT : $84.98M

Return for Risk

CYBR vs. CLBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLBT

CLBT Risk / Return Rank: 26
CLBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CLBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CLBT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CLBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CLBT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBR vs. CLBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CYBR	CLBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.12	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CYBR	CLBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-67.74%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-43.61%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-48.35%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-34.51%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CYBR	CLBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	51.76%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	50.35%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	50.35%	—

Dividends

CYBR vs. CLBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CYBR nor CLBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CYBR vs. CLBT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CyberArk Software Ltd. and Cellebrite DI Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

CLBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a gross profit of 105.88M and revenue of 128.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

CLBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.23M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.

CLBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a net income of 10.94M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CYBR and CLBT in my portfolio?

CYBR and CLBT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.