CW vs. LMT
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CW in Specialty Industrial Machinery, LMT in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, CW returned 24.24%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for LMT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CW vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 30.89% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 24.24%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 30.89%
- 6M
- 31.73%
- 1Y
- 59.68%
- 3Y*
- 61.13%
- 5Y*
- 42.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.24%
LMT
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
CW vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 30.89% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 8.80% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and LMT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.32 |
The correlation between CW and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CW:
$26.73B
LMT:
$120.19B
CW:
$13.64
LMT:
$20.61
CW:
52.89
LMT:
25.23
CW:
7.49
LMT:
1.61
CW:
10.16
LMT:
16.05
CW:
$3.61B
LMT:
$75.12B
CW:
$1.34B
LMT:
$7.37B
CW:
$745.31M
LMT:
$8.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
CW
LMT
CW vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CW | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | 0.43 | +4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.46 | 1.04 | +12.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CW | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 0.41 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.53 | 0.40 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.46 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.38 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
CW vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -79.29% | +20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -25.15% | +12.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -31.79% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -31.79% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -36.67% | -12.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.95% | -22.64% | +18.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -26.84% | +12.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 10.51% | -6.06% |
Volatility
CW vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.31%. This indicates that CW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 5.31% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.62% | 19.60% | +6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.71% | 26.62% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 22.88% | +4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.28% | 23.72% | +6.56% |
Dividends
CW vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than LMT's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.62% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
Financials
CW vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CW vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and LMT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CW has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to LMT (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs LMT's -79.29%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer