PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVX vs. HLMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chevron Corporation (CVX) and Halma plc (HLMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CVX is traded in USD, while HLMA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HLMA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVX achieves a 26.53% return, which is significantly lower than HLMA.L's 32.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CVX has underperformed HLMA.L with an annualized return of 10.98%, while HLMA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.59% annualized return.


CVX

1D
1.03%
1M
5.15%
YTD
26.53%
6M
29.68%
1Y
40.62%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
10.98%

HLMA.L

1D
1.30%
1M
1.59%
YTD
32.29%
6M
29.81%
1Y
57.48%
3Y*
28.56%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
17.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVX
Chevron Corporation
26.53%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%
HLMA.L
Halma plc
32.29%42.52%16.72%22.94%-44.39%30.29%20.15%62.62%3.28%55.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CVX and HLMA.L is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.20

The correlation between CVX and HLMA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CVX:

$375.81B

HLMA.L:

£17.89B

EPS

CVX:

$5.75

HLMA.L:

£1.46

PE Ratio

CVX:

32.89

HLMA.L:

32.33

PEG Ratio

CVX:

3.20

HLMA.L:

3.11

PS Ratio

CVX:

1.95

HLMA.L:

4.49

PB Ratio

CVX:

2.05

HLMA.L:

9.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVX:

$185.89B

HLMA.L:

£3.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVX:

$47.27B

HLMA.L:

£1.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVX:

$40.44B

HLMA.L:

£936.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVX vs. HLMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HLMA.L
HLMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chevron Corporation (CVX) and Halma plc (HLMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVXHLMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.96

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

14.76

-7.39

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVX and HLMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVXHLMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.18

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.41

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.65

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.52

-0.15

Drawdowns

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVX drawdown since its inception was -55.77%, smaller than the maximum HLMA.L drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVX and HLMA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVXHLMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.77%

-60.44%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-14.43%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.64%

-28.38%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-49.10%

+24.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.77%

-49.10%

-6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.56%

-3.82%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-13.57%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

3.88%

+1.65%

Volatility

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chevron Corporation (CVX) is 7.14%, while Halma plc (HLMA.L) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that CVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVXHLMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

9.55%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.78%

20.83%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.97%

26.27%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.13%

28.24%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.16%

26.95%

+2.21%

Dividends

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Dividend Comparison

CVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than HLMA.L's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.69%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
HLMA.L
Halma plc
0.50%0.67%0.83%0.91%0.98%0.57%0.69%0.76%1.11%1.12%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chevron Corporation and Halma plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
47.56B
1.24B
(CVX) Total Revenue
(HLMA.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CVX values in USD, HLMA.L values in GBp

CVX vs. HLMA.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chevron Corporation and Halma plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
9.6%
0
Portfolio components
CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

HLMA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

HLMA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported an operating income of 256.90M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

HLMA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported a net income of 186.80M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVX and HLMA.L have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVX and HLMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer