PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVCG.L vs. TREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CVCG.L is traded in GBp, while TREG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TREG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVCG.L achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than TREG.L's 5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CVCG.L has outperformed TREG.L with an annualized return of 7.63%, while TREG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.


CVCG.L

1D
0.43%
1M
1.75%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.23%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
7.63%

TREG.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
5.14%
6M
4.79%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVCG.L
CVC Income & Growth Limited
2.23%7.43%29.84%16.66%-8.32%16.00%0.13%-4.12%-0.03%14.08%
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
5.14%6.64%2.78%7.62%-16.75%31.33%-10.05%3.51%-0.21%-4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CVCG.L and TREG.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVCG.L
CVCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CVCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TREG.L
TREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVCG.LTREG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.33

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

4.25

-1.37

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVCG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the TREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVCG.L and TREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVCG.LTREG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.08

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.21

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.11

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.27

+0.03

Drawdowns

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVCG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than TREG.L's maximum drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVCG.L and TREG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVCG.LTREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-38.57%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.61%

-9.39%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.61%

-15.31%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

-26.89%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.23%

-35.67%

-9.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.89%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-11.04%

+6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.93%

-0.91%

Volatility

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L - Volatility Comparison

CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that CVCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVCG.LTREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.45%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

9.28%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

11.55%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

14.68%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

16.03%

+7.75%

Dividends

CVCG.L vs. TREG.L - Dividend Comparison

CVCG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than TREG.L's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVCG.L
CVC Income & Growth Limited
8.36%8.64%7.58%7.07%4.83%3.77%4.53%4.86%4.48%4.06%4.95%3.59%
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.47%3.57%3.48%3.64%4.54%1.82%4.49%3.41%3.83%2.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVCG.L and TREG.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVCG.L and TREG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer