PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTC-A.TO vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CTC-A.TO is traded in CAD, while NEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTC-A.TO achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CTC-A.TO has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 6.08%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.50% annualized return.


CTC-A.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
5.08%
6M
7.04%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
6.08%

NEM

1D
-0.45%
1M
-13.07%
YTD
1.39%
6M
12.60%
1Y
94.95%
3Y*
38.59%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
14.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
5.08%20.07%12.82%3.76%-19.20%11.26%24.13%0.73%-11.01%19.72%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.39%160.36%-0.03%-10.93%-15.75%7.35%36.96%25.14%1.74%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CTC-A.TO and NEM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.04

The correlation between CTC-A.TO and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CTC-A.TO:

CA$11.14

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

16.08

NEM:

15.62

PEG Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

0.31

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

0.59

NEM:

4.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$16.43B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$5.41B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$2.09B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTC-A.TO
CTC-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTC-A.TONEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.33

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

3.61

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

9.68

-9.06

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTC-A.TO and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTC-A.TONEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

2.04

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.36

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.40

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.16

+0.14

Drawdowns

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTC-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTC-A.TO and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTC-A.TONEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-70.02%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.35%

-26.48%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.70%

-33.96%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.90%

-59.76%

+28.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.16%

-59.76%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-22.70%

+12.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-29.17%

+13.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.41%

9.85%

-1.44%

Volatility

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) is 7.54%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 14.36%. This indicates that CTC-A.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTC-A.TONEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

14.36%

-6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

37.08%

-22.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

46.86%

-25.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.06%

38.01%

-15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.87%

36.03%

-10.16%

Dividends

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

CTC-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than NEM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
3.99%4.08%4.63%4.90%4.13%2.59%2.72%2.97%2.52%1.59%1.67%1.79%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.03%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

CTC-A.TO vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
3.57B
0
(CTC-A.TO) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CTC-A.TO values in CAD, NEM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CTC-A.TO and NEM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTC-A.TO and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer