PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTC-A.TO vs. APH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CTC-A.TO is traded in CAD, while APH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the APH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTC-A.TO achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 8.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CTC-A.TO has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 6.08%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.83% annualized return.


CTC-A.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
5.08%
6M
7.04%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
6.08%

APH

1D
3.74%
1M
14.49%
YTD
8.41%
6M
3.75%
1Y
58.05%
3Y*
57.80%
5Y*
38.49%
10Y*
27.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
5.08%20.07%12.82%3.76%-19.20%11.26%24.13%0.73%-11.01%19.72%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
8.41%87.13%53.27%28.71%-6.38%35.18%19.19%29.35%1.01%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CTC-A.TO and APH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.29

The correlation between CTC-A.TO and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTC-A.TO:

CA$9.49B

APH:

$185.20B

EPS

CTC-A.TO:

CA$11.14

APH:

$4.58

PE Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

16.08

APH:

31.32

PEG Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

0.31

APH:

1.04

PS Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

0.59

APH:

7.11

PB Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

1.63

APH:

13.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$16.43B

APH:

$25.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$5.41B

APH:

$9.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$2.09B

APH:

$7.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTC-A.TO vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTC-A.TO
CTC-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTC-A.TOAPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.26

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.08

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

5.32

-4.70

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the APH Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTC-A.TO and APH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTC-A.TOAPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.42

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

1.24

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.98

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.76

-0.46

Drawdowns

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTC-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTC-A.TO and APH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTC-A.TOAPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-55.35%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.35%

-28.02%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.70%

-28.02%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.90%

-28.40%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.16%

-33.92%

-24.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-11.99%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-8.18%

-7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.41%

10.94%

-2.53%

Volatility

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) is 7.54%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 16.90%. This indicates that CTC-A.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTC-A.TOAPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

16.90%

-9.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

37.08%

-22.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

41.31%

-19.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.06%

31.24%

-9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.87%

28.51%

-2.64%

Dividends

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Dividend Comparison

CTC-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than APH's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.58%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
3.99%4.08%4.63%4.90%4.13%2.59%2.72%2.97%2.52%1.59%1.67%1.79%

Financials

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
3.57B
7.62B
(CTC-A.TO) Total Revenue
(APH) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CTC-A.TO values in CAD, APH values in USD

CTC-A.TO vs. APH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd and Amphenol Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%20222023202420252026
34.0%
36.8%
Portfolio components
CTC-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 3.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

CTC-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported an operating income of 254.30M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

CTC-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a net income of 107.00M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CTC-A.TO and APH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTC-A.TO and APH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer