CSPX.L vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
CSPX.L and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both CSPX.L and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSPX.L or VGT.
Key characteristics
| CSPX.L | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.21% | 2.57% |
| 1Y Return | 25.02% | 35.47% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.04% | 9.64% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.12% | 19.53% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.19% | 20.05% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.21 | 1.78 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.30% | 18.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.90% | -54.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.57% | -6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSPX.L and VGT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CSPX.L vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 2.57% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 12.19%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.05% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSPX.L vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSPX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSPX.L vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSPX.L vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.73% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
CSPX.L vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSPX.L vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) is 3.26%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that CSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.