CSPX.L vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSPX.L returned 13.26%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSPX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.

CSPX.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 6M: 9.11%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 13.26%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

GLDM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -8.41%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 30.55%
• 3Y*: 30.08%
• 5Y*: 17.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	8.33%	17.45%	25.25%	26.74%	-18.72%	29.35%	17.62%	30.55%	-6.62%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.30%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.L and GLDM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.06

The correlation between CSPX.L and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSPX.L	GLDM
Technology	38.2%	-
Financial Services	11.1%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	-
Healthcare	8.3%	-
Industrials	7.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	100.0%

Return for Risk

CSPX.L vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPX.L

CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 34
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSPX.L	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.15	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	1.54	+1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.23	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	1.53	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.18	3.85	+9.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.L and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSPX.L	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	1.15	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	1.00	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.99	-0.06

Drawdowns

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSPX.L	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.90%	-21.63%	-12.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-20.00%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.50%	-20.00%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	-20.92%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.33%	-19.80%	+17.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-6.24%	+2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	7.96%	-6.05%

Volatility

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) is 3.36%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that CSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSPX.L	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	5.65%	-2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	23.31%	-14.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.81%	26.65%	-14.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	17.98%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	16.89%	-0.68%

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSPX.L vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSPX.L nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSPX.L and GLDM in my portfolio?

CSPX.L and GLDM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSPX.L or GLDM?

On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSPX.L or GLDM?

CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between CSPX.L and GLDM?

CSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while GLDM is Gold. CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.L and 0.10% for GLDM.