PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSPX.AS vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSPX.AS is traded in EUR, while UUP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UUP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.AS achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.AS has outperformed UUP with an annualized return of 14.96%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.94% annualized return.


CSPX.AS

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.89%
YTD
11.52%
6M
10.96%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
14.96%

UUP

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.76%
YTD
5.61%
6M
4.01%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.52%4.00%33.87%22.28%-14.24%40.26%7.72%32.99%-0.36%7.13%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.61%-16.26%20.99%0.52%16.24%13.64%-14.36%6.44%12.07%-20.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.AS and UUP is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2014

0.28

The correlation between CSPX.AS and UUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSPX.AS vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPX.AS
CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSPX.ASUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.07

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

0.56

+3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

1.34

+11.41

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.AS and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSPX.ASUUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

0.36

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.49

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.21

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.16

+0.77

Drawdowns

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, roughly equal to the maximum UUP drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.AS and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSPX.ASUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-34.79%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-7.84%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-22.00%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-22.51%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-27.97%

-5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-13.76%

+13.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-15.68%

+11.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

3.29%

-1.29%

Volatility

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSPX.ASUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.56%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

8.49%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

12.24%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

14.73%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

14.11%

+1.94%

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPX.AS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSPX.AS vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

CSPX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.31%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSPX.AS and UUP have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

CSPX.AS is categorized as S&P 500, while UUP is Currency. CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.AS and 0.75% for UUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.AS and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer