CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L
CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSP1.L returned 14.54%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for VDPG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VDPG.L.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while VDPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VDPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 40.95% return.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.89%
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 40.95%
- 6M
- 45.03%
- 1Y
- 73.19%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 9.33% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 1.90% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 40.95% | 30.58% | -3.06% | 4.10% | -1.89% | 1.95% | 15.56% | -19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and VDPG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CSP1.L and VDPG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Financial Services
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Communication Services
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Healthcare
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Industrials
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Defensive
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Energy
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Utilities
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Real Estate
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Basic Materials
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
VDPG.L
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSP1.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.62 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 5.41 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 19.65 | -5.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSP1.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 3.41 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.56 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.37 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum VDPG.L drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and VDPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -40.69% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -13.45% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -26.18% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -26.18% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -9.06% | +7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -11.25% | +7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.71% | -1.77% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 2.72%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 12.02% | -9.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 19.21% | -12.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 21.40% | -10.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 21.15% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 23.24% | -4.80% |
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSP1.L nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSP1.L and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VDPG.L.
CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.15% for VDPG.L.
Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and VDPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer