CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L
CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and V3AB.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while V3AB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSP1.L returned 14.54%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for V3AB.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for V3AB.L.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while V3AB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3AB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than V3AB.L's 10.50% return.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.89%
V3AB.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 9.33% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 24.58% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.50% | 12.16% | 19.63% | 18.07% | -13.32% | 17.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and V3AB.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CSP1.L and V3AB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Financial Services
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Communication Services
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Healthcare
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Industrials
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Consumer Defensive
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Energy
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Utilities
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Real Estate
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Basic Materials
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
V3AB.L
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSP1.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.48 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 14.09 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSP1.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.34 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.80 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.86 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than V3AB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and V3AB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -19.04% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -7.90% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -19.04% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -19.04% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -2.13% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -4.80% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.96% | -0.02% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 2.72%, while Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3AB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 3.48% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 8.87% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 11.77% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 13.71% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 13.64% | +4.80% |
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than V3AB.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. V3AB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSP1.L nor V3AB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, CSP1.L and V3AB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AB.L.
CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while V3AB.L is Global Equities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while V3AB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.24% for V3AB.L.
Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and V3AB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer