PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSHI vs. USDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSHI vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSHI having a 2.22% return and USDX slightly lower at 2.19%.


CSHI

1D
0.12%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.22%
6M
2.51%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
10Y*

USDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.64%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CSHI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.22%5.05%4.76%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
2.19%6.25%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and USDX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024

-0.02

CSHI vs. USDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSHI
USDX

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
84.7%

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

CSHI
35.6%
USDX

-

Financial Services

CSHI
11.8%
USDX
84.7%

Communication Services

CSHI
11.2%
USDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

CSHI
10.1%
USDX

-

Healthcare

CSHI
8.5%
USDX

-

Industrials

CSHI
8.3%
USDX

-

Consumer Defensive

CSHI
4.9%
USDX

-

Energy

CSHI
3.5%
USDX

-

Utilities

CSHI
2.3%
USDX

-

Real Estate

CSHI
1.9%
USDX

-

Basic Materials

CSHI
1.8%
USDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSHI vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI
CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

USDX
USDX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSHIUSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.61

1.83

+0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.71

6.97

+18.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

141.38

47.52

+93.87

CSHI vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHI Sharpe Ratio is 5.80, which is higher than the USDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHI and USDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSHIUSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.80

3.29

+2.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.15

3.98

+0.17

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and USDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSHIUSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-0.94%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-0.94%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.25%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-0.06%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.14%

-0.10%

Volatility

CSHI vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) is 0.27%, while SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSHIUSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

1.07%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.57%

1.80%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

1.99%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.33%

1.71%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.33%

1.71%

-0.38%

CSHI vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSHI vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than USDX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CSHI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
4.91%5.11%5.72%6.15%1.52%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
5.88%5.88%4.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSHI and USDX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USDX has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to CSHI (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs USDX's -0.94%.

On 1-year performance, USDX leads with 6.51% vs 5.13% for CSHI. On fees, CSHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USDX has performed better with a 6.51% return vs 5.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 4.91% for CSHI.

CSHI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while USDX is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.98% for USDX.

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.80 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSHI and USDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer