PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWV vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWV vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 42.95% return, which is significantly higher than IWR's 10.71% return.


CRWV

1D
1.97%
1M
-10.32%
YTD
42.95%
6M
18.70%
1Y
-26.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWR

1D
0.08%
1M
1.05%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.50%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWV vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
42.95%83.62%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
10.71%13.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWV and IWR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWV vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWV
CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWV vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRWVIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.25

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

2.37

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

9.09

-9.71

CRWV vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWV Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWV and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWVIWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

1.43

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.49

+0.57

Drawdowns

CRWV vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, which is greater than IWR's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWVIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.84%

-58.78%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.84%

-8.17%

-56.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.24%

-2.04%

-42.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.21%

-7.80%

-29.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.73%

2.12%

+41.61%

Volatility

CRWV vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a higher volatility of 25.28% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 3.59%. This indicates that CRWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWVIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.28%

3.59%

+21.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.15%

10.06%

+58.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.71%

13.54%

+82.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

114.59%

18.25%

+96.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.59%

19.38%

+95.21%

Dividends

CRWV vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

CRWV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.17%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRWV and IWR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRWV has higher volatility (25.28%) compared to IWR (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWV dropped -64.84% vs IWR's -58.78%.

IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWV and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer