CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO
CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) and BTQ.NEO (BTQ Technologies Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past year, CRWV returned -26.96% vs 37.44% for BTQ.NEO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRWV is traded in USD, while BTQ.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BTQ.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 42.95% return, which is significantly higher than BTQ.NEO's -17.44% return.
CRWV
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- YTD
- 42.95%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- -26.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTQ.NEO
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- 39.02%
- YTD
- -17.44%
- 6M
- -35.31%
- 1Y
- 37.44%
- 3Y*
- 106.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 42.95% | 83.62% |
BTQ.NEO BTQ Technologies Corp | -17.44% | 182.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWV and BTQ.NEO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
CRWV:
$53.95B
BTQ.NEO:
CA$821.41M
CRWV:
-$3.27
BTQ.NEO:
-CA$0.11
CRWV:
8.00
BTQ.NEO:
1.42K
CRWV:
11.34
BTQ.NEO:
21.55
CRWV:
$6.23B
BTQ.NEO:
CA$565.50K
CRWV:
$4.32B
BTQ.NEO:
CA$565.50K
CRWV:
$1.89B
BTQ.NEO:
-CA$14.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
CRWV
BTQ.NEO
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRWV | BTQ.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.18 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.45 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 0.64 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWV | BTQ.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 0.24 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.51 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, smaller than the maximum BTQ.NEO drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and BTQ.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWV | BTQ.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.84% | -84.79% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.84% | -84.79% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.24% | -69.88% | +25.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.21% | -47.31% | +10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.73% | 59.10% | -15.37% |
Volatility
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) is 25.28%, while BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO) has a volatility of 42.02%. This indicates that CRWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTQ.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWV | BTQ.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.28% | 42.02% | -16.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.15% | 84.92% | -16.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.71% | 161.69% | -65.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.59% | 172.11% | -57.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.59% | 172.11% | -57.52% |
Dividends
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWV nor BTQ.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRWV vs. BTQ.NEO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreWeave, Inc. and BTQ Technologies Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWV and BTQ.NEO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRWV and BTQ.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer