PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWD vs. VFEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWD vs. VFEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CRWD is traded in USD, while VFEG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VFEG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than VFEG.L's 8.09% return.


CRWD

1D
-1.82%
1M
24.83%
YTD
40.54%
6M
27.87%
1Y
40.64%
3Y*
63.94%
5Y*
25.22%
10Y*

VFEG.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
8.09%
6M
9.44%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWD vs. VFEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
40.54%37.00%34.01%142.49%-48.58%-3.34%324.74%-25.47%
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
8.09%26.00%12.22%6.63%-17.18%-0.91%14.68%-10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and VFEG.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWD vs. VFEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD
CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VFEG.L
VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. VFEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRWDVFEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

2.22

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

7.75

-5.23

CRWD vs. VFEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and VFEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWDVFEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.55

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.20

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.20

+0.54

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. VFEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than VFEG.L's maximum drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and VFEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWDVFEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-39.28%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.18%

-11.01%

-26.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.44%

-20.69%

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.69%

-33.48%

-34.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-4.68%

-11.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.64%

-14.94%

-8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.18%

3.16%

+13.02%

Volatility

CRWD vs. VFEG.L - Volatility Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 17.60% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) at 6.08%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWDVFEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.60%

6.08%

+11.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.02%

12.96%

+24.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.06%

15.82%

+29.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.79%

22.04%

+28.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.99%

23.80%

+32.19%

Dividends

CRWD vs. VFEG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWD nor VFEG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CRWD and VFEG.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWD and VFEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer