CRWD vs. SMR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 25.22%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for SMR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRWD vs. SMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -24.06% return.

CRWD

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: 24.83%
• YTD: 40.54%
• 6M: 27.87%
• 1Y: 40.64%
• 3Y*: 63.94%
• 5Y*: 25.22%
• 10Y*: —

SMR

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -14.26%
• YTD: -24.06%
• 6M: -50.09%
• 1Y: -68.68%
• 3Y*: 10.94%
• 5Y*: 1.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWD vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	40.54%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	27.47%
SMR NuScale Power Corporation	-24.06%	-20.97%	444.98%	-67.93%	2.29%	-0.89%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and SMR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020	0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRWD : $169.89B SMR : $3.44B
EPS CRWD : -$0.02 SMR : -$2.02
PS Ratio CRWD : 32.89 SMR : 113.60
PB Ratio CRWD : 36.66 SMR : 2.95
Total Revenue (TTM) CRWD : $5.09B SMR : $18.10M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRWD : $3.82B SMR : $4.45M
EBITDA (TTM) CRWD : $246.78M SMR : -$696.20M

Return for Risk

CRWD vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 66
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 65
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

SMR

SMR Risk / Return Rank: 13
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRWD	SMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	-0.66	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	-0.89	+2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.91	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	-0.83	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.52	-1.22	+3.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRWD vs. SMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the SMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and SMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRWD	SMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	-0.66	+1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.02	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.02	+0.73

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and SMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWD	SMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	-87.47%	+19.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.18%	-82.86%	+45.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.44%	-82.86%	+38.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.69%	-87.47%	+19.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.77%	-79.86%	+64.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.64%	-34.97%	+11.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.18%	56.46%	-40.28%

Volatility

CRWD vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) is 17.60%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 29.21%. This indicates that CRWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRWD	SMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.60%	29.21%	-11.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.02%	69.12%	-32.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.06%	104.37%	-59.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.79%	93.41%	-42.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.99%	89.34%	-33.35%

Dividends

CRWD vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWD nor SMR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWD and SMR in my portfolio?

CRWD and SMR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRWD or SMR?

SMR has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to CRWD (17.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs SMR's -87.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.