PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while EQQQ.DE (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 25.22%/yr vs 16.67%/yr for EQQQ.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CRWD is traded in USD, while EQQQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.DE's 15.90% return.

CRWD

1D
-1.82%
1M
24.83%
YTD
40.54%
6M
27.87%
1Y
40.64%
3Y*
63.94%
5Y*
25.22%
10Y*
—

EQQQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.50%
YTD
15.90%
6M
15.30%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
27.07%
5Y*
16.67%
10Y*
21.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.		40.54%37.00%34.01%142.49%-48.58%-3.34%324.74%-21.46%
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		15.90%20.72%26.03%56.11%-33.95%28.43%47.73%16.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and EQQQ.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with CRWD:
CRWD vs. PANWCRWD vs. SNOWCRWD vs. FTNTCRWD vs. ZSCRWD vs. NVDACRWD vs. NETCRWD vs. DDOG
Often compared with EQQQ.DE:
EQQQ.DE vs. CNDX.LEQQQ.DE vs. QQQEQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DEEQQQ.DE vs. IUIT.LEQQQ.DE vs. EQQB.DEEQQQ.DE vs. EQAC.MIEQQQ.DE vs. SMGB.L

Return for Risk

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CRWD
CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE
EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CRWDEQQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.91
2.24

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.46
3.07

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.38

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.25

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

11.94

-9.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and EQQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CRWDEQQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

2.24

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.80

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.03

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.15

+0.59

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, roughly equal to the maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown of -66.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and EQQQ.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CRWDEQQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-66.87%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.18%

-10.94%

-26.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.44%

-23.03%

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.69%

-35.11%

-32.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.11%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-3.53%

-12.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.64%

-14.04%

-9.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.18%

2.98%

+13.20%

Volatility

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 17.60% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) at 5.05%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CRWDEQQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.60%

5.05%

+12.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.02%

11.66%

+25.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.06%

15.88%

+29.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.79%

20.68%

+30.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.99%

20.66%

+35.33%

Dividends

CRWD vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.37%0.39%0.57%0.25%0.41%0.54%0.64%0.68%0.78%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

CRWD and EQQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWD and EQQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer