PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CROX vs. GPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CROX vs. GPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 41.08% return, which is significantly higher than GPN's -16.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed GPN with an annualized return of 27.39%, while GPN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.93% annualized return.


CROX

1D
1.09%
1M
16.42%
YTD
41.08%
6M
39.95%
1Y
18.91%
3Y*
1.26%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
27.39%

GPN

1D
-2.74%
1M
-6.78%
YTD
-16.39%
6M
-16.69%
1Y
-15.04%
3Y*
-12.74%
5Y*
-18.86%
10Y*
-0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CROX vs. GPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
41.08%-21.92%17.26%-13.85%-15.43%104.63%49.58%61.24%105.54%84.26%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-16.39%-30.11%-10.97%29.02%-25.91%-36.91%18.51%77.25%2.92%44.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and GPN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2006

0.34

Fundamentals

EPS

CROX:

-$1.94

GPN:

-$3.90

PS Ratio

CROX:

1.60

GPN:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

CROX:

$4.02B

GPN:

$8.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CROX:

$2.34B

GPN:

$4.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

CROX:

$297.04M

GPN:

$2.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CROX vs. GPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CROX
CROX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CROX vs. GPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CROXGPNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.96

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

-0.51

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

-1.04

+2.03

CROX vs. GPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the GPN Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and GPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CROXGPNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

-0.38

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.52

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

-0.03

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.37

-0.20

Drawdowns

CROX vs. GPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than GPN's maximum drawdown of -70.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and GPN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CROXGPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.74%

-70.06%

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.54%

-29.70%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.04%

-53.78%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.86%

-66.40%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

-70.06%

-5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.18%

-69.20%

+36.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.28%

-18.88%

-42.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.17%

14.54%

+4.63%

Volatility

CROX vs. GPN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) is 11.01%, while Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that CROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CROXGPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.01%

11.67%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.82%

30.13%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.52%

39.34%

+13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.12%

36.54%

+18.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.96%

34.51%

+21.45%

Dividends

CROX vs. GPN - Dividend Comparison

CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.55%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%

Financials

CROX vs. GPN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and Global Payments Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
921.46M
2.97B
(CROX) Total Revenue
(GPN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CROX vs. GPN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crocs, Inc. and Global Payments Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
56.8%
0
Portfolio components
CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.

GPN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

GPN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

GPN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CROX and GPN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPN has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to CROX (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CROX dropped -98.74% vs GPN's -70.06%.

CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CROX and GPN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer