PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRM vs. STXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRM vs. STXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -30.92% return, which is significantly lower than STXS's -21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has outperformed STXS with an annualized return of 8.51%, while STXS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.46% annualized return.


CRM

1D
-1.68%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-30.92%
6M
-29.37%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
-4.89%
5Y*
-4.74%
10Y*
8.51%

STXS

1D
1.69%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
-21.30%
6M
-23.31%
1Y
-19.56%
3Y*
-4.83%
5Y*
-26.66%
10Y*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRM vs. STXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-30.92%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%
STXS
Stereotaxis, Inc.
-21.30%0.88%30.29%-15.46%-66.61%21.81%-3.78%389.36%35.12%23.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CRM and STXS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2004

0.22

The correlation between CRM and STXS shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRM:

$159.00B

STXS:

$178.99M

EPS

CRM:

$8.59

STXS:

-$0.23

PS Ratio

CRM:

3.98

STXS:

5.44

PB Ratio

CRM:

4.64

STXS:

19.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRM:

$42.83B

STXS:

$31.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRM:

$33.25B

STXS:

$16.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRM:

$12.32B

STXS:

-$20.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRM vs. STXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

STXS
STXS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
STXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
STXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRM vs. STXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMSTXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.98

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.38

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

-0.62

-1.00

CRM vs. STXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the STXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRM and STXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMSTXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

-0.34

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.40

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.06

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.16

+0.61

Drawdowns

CRM vs. STXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, smaller than the maximum STXS drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and STXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMSTXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-99.68%

+29.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.36%

-51.54%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.70%

-51.54%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

-86.04%

+27.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.62%

-86.04%

+27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.87%

-98.88%

+49.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.12%

-82.60%

+66.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.48%

31.34%

-10.86%

Volatility

CRM vs. STXS - Volatility Comparison

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) have volatilities of 16.96% and 17.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMSTXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.96%

17.07%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.74%

33.64%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.87%

57.17%

-19.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.02%

66.26%

-29.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.36%

74.96%

-39.60%

Dividends

CRM vs. STXS - Dividend Comparison

CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while STXS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%
STXS
Stereotaxis, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CRM vs. STXS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Salesforce, Inc. and Stereotaxis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
11.13B
6.29M
(CRM) Total Revenue
(STXS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRM vs. STXS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Salesforce, Inc. and Stereotaxis, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
76.9%
60.3%
Portfolio components
CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

STXS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stereotaxis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.79M and revenue of 6.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

STXS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stereotaxis, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.98M and revenue of 6.29M, resulting in an operating margin of -95.1%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

STXS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stereotaxis, Inc. reported a net income of -6.17M and revenue of 6.29M, resulting in a net margin of -98.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRM and STXS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STXS has higher volatility (17.07%) compared to CRM (16.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRM dropped -70.50% vs STXS's -99.68%.

STXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRM and STXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer