PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CQQQ is traded in USD, while XNKY.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XNKY.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 30.80% return.


CQQQ

1D
-1.08%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
-2.77%
6M
-3.14%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
-8.26%
10Y*
5.12%

XNKY.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
4.00%
YTD
30.80%
6M
31.21%
1Y
62.58%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
-2.77%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%9.79%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
30.80%31.13%7.80%21.76%-20.02%-4.98%19.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and XNKY.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2020

0.37

The correlation between CQQQ and XNKY.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CQQQXNKY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

4.10

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

13.45

-11.45

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and XNKY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CQQQXNKY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.49

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.56

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.68

-0.51

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than XNKY.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and XNKY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQQQXNKY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-35.76%

-38.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-15.19%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.93%

-18.89%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.96%

-33.88%

-33.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.77%

-1.33%

-50.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.31%

-12.31%

-16.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

4.64%

+5.84%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) at 6.98%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQQQXNKY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

6.98%

+4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.45%

19.80%

+2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.22%

25.01%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.08%

20.03%

+18.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.34%

19.90%

+13.44%

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQQQ vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while XNKY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.23%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CQQQ and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ is categorized as China Equities, while XNKY.DE is Japan Equities. CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQQQ and XNKY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer