PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COV.PA vs. GMG.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Covivio SA (COV.PA) and Goodman Group (GMG.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COV.PA is traded in EUR, while GMG.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the GMG.AX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COV.PA achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly lower than GMG.AX's 8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, COV.PA has underperformed GMG.AX with an annualized return of 0.55%, while GMG.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.08% annualized return.


COV.PA

1D
0.66%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
1.26%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
-3.20%
10Y*
0.55%

GMG.AX

1D
-1.68%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.96%
6M
14.14%
1Y
1.22%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
17.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COV.PA
Covivio SA
-2.85%18.51%7.76%-7.99%-19.04%0.60%-19.00%26.14%-6.51%15.27%
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
8.96%-16.64%37.04%43.19%-33.70%43.33%43.56%29.55%22.76%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between COV.PA and GMG.AX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.18

The correlation between COV.PA and GMG.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COV.PA
COV.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
COV.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COV.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
COV.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
COV.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COV.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GMG.AX
GMG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Covivio SA (COV.PA) and Goodman Group (GMG.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COV.PAGMG.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.04

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.10

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.05

0.23

+0.82

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COV.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COV.PA and GMG.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COV.PAGMG.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.09

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.33

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.60

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.08

+0.29

Drawdowns

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COV.PA drawdown since its inception was -77.24%, smaller than the maximum GMG.AX drawdown of -97.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COV.PA and GMG.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COV.PAGMG.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.24%

-97.89%

+20.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.90%

-24.53%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-38.86%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.90%

-40.78%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-49.11%

-15.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.71%

-17.82%

-13.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-50.02%

+29.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

10.66%

-3.78%

Volatility

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Covivio SA (COV.PA) is 5.72%, while Goodman Group (GMG.AX) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that COV.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMG.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COV.PAGMG.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

8.58%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

22.90%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

27.80%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.82%

28.88%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.90%

28.44%

+1.46%

Dividends

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Dividend Comparison

COV.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than GMG.AX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COV.PA
Covivio SA
2.80%1.79%6.77%5.05%6.76%4.99%6.37%4.55%5.34%1.09%3.72%1.58%
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
0.96%0.97%0.42%1.19%1.73%0.74%0.80%1.17%2.75%3.20%3.48%3.67%

Financials

COV.PA vs. GMG.AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Covivio SA and Goodman Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. COV.PA values in EUR, GMG.AX values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


COV.PA and GMG.AX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COV.PA and GMG.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer