PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COST vs. SCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COST vs. SCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COST

1D
0.30%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
13.35%
6M
10.14%
1Y
-3.42%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
22.05%
10Y*
22.25%

SCS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COST vs. SCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
13.35%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%
SCS
Steelcase Inc.
0.00%39.89%-9.11%97.75%-36.31%-9.87%-31.43%42.60%1.19%-12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between COST and SCS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1998

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between COST and SCS has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

COST:

$26.51

SCS:

$0.80

PE Ratio

COST:

36.77

SCS:

20.20

PEG Ratio

COST:

2.88

SCS:

0.09

PS Ratio

COST:

1.11

SCS:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

COST:

$293.59B

SCS:

$3.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COST:

$11.12B

SCS:

$1.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

COST:

$12.48B

SCS:

$208.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COST vs. SCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SCS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST vs. SCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COSTSCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.51

COST vs. SCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSTSCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

Drawdowns

COST vs. SCS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSTSCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.15%

Volatility

COST vs. SCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSTSCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

Dividends

COST vs. SCS - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while SCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
SCS
Steelcase Inc.
1.24%1.86%4.23%2.22%6.93%4.56%2.73%2.83%3.64%3.36%3.31%2.27%

Financials

COST vs. SCS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Steelcase Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
70.53B
897.10M
(COST) Total Revenue
(SCS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COST vs. SCS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Steelcase Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
-25.1%
34.8%
Portfolio components
COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

SCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a gross profit of 312.10M and revenue of 897.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

SCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported an operating income of 53.10M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

SCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a net income of 35.00M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COST and SCS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COST and SCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer