COST vs. INVA
COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) and INVA (Innoviva, Inc.) are both stocks. COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while INVA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, COST returned 22.25%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for INVA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COST vs. INVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than INVA's 11.71% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed INVA with an annualized return of 22.25%, while INVA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.00% annualized return.
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
INVA
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
COST vs. INVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
INVA Innoviva, Inc. | 11.71% | 15.22% | 8.17% | 21.06% | -23.19% | 39.23% | -12.50% | -18.85% | 22.97% | 32.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and INVA is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, the correlation between COST and INVA has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
COST:
$26.51
INVA:
$5.94
COST:
36.77
INVA:
3.76
COST:
2.88
INVA:
0.02
COST:
1.11
INVA:
4.47
COST:
$293.59B
INVA:
$424.12M
COST:
$11.12B
INVA:
$323.16M
COST:
$12.48B
INVA:
$438.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST vs. INVA — Risk / Return Rank
COST
INVA
COST vs. INVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COST | INVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.05 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 0.15 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 0.34 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COST | INVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 0.12 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.46 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.21 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.05 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
COST vs. INVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum INVA drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and INVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST | INVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -84.32% | +30.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -23.53% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -23.53% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -47.01% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -59.57% | +28.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.93% | -30.17% | +19.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -44.65% | +31.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.15% | 10.21% | -3.06% |
Volatility
COST vs. INVA - Volatility Comparison
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) have volatilities of 7.71% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST | INVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 7.62% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 16.91% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 28.81% | -10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 27.28% | -4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 33.89% | -11.94% |
Dividends
COST vs. INVA - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while INVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
INVA Innoviva, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.12% |
Financials
COST vs. INVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Innoviva, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
COST and INVA have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to INVA (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COST dropped -53.39% vs INVA's -84.32%.
INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COST and INVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer