COR vs. CLS.TO
COR (Cencora Inc.) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. COR operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare), while CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, COR returned 17.00%/yr vs 43.13%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COR vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COR is traded in USD, while CLS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COR achieves a -18.53% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 30.20% return. Over the past 10 years, COR has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 17.00%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 43.13% annualized return.
COR
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- -18.53%
- 6M
- -18.54%
- 1Y
- -4.43%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 20.49%
- 10Y*
- 17.00%
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 30.20%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 218.72%
- 3Y*
- 209.37%
- 5Y*
- 114.69%
- 10Y*
- 43.13%
COR vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COR Cencora Inc. | -18.53% | 51.48% | 10.37% | 25.33% | 26.26% | 44.09% | 23.37% | 23.51% | -17.57% | 19.51% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 30.20% | 220.69% | 215.14% | 160.52% | 1.78% | 37.36% | -2.32% | -6.08% | -16.29% | -11.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between COR and CLS.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.19 |
The correlation between COR and CLS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COR:
$53.55B
CLS.TO:
CA$62.28B
COR:
$13.07
CLS.TO:
CA$8.28
COR:
20.97
CLS.TO:
64.97
COR:
9.96
CLS.TO:
0.87
COR:
0.16
CLS.TO:
4.52
COR:
15.76
CLS.TO:
29.68
COR:
$328.68B
CLS.TO:
CA$13.81B
COR:
$11.66B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.60B
COR:
$3.64B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COR vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
COR
CLS.TO
COR vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cencora Inc. (COR) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COR | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.40 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 7.45 | -7.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 18.87 | -19.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COR | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 3.07 | -3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 2.04 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.88 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.43 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
COR vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COR drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, smaller than the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COR and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COR | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.01% | -80.63% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.44% | -29.56% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | -53.42% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.44% | -53.42% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.44% | -80.63% | +48.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.57% | -18.17% | -8.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -26.18% | +12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.26% | 11.65% | -0.39% |
Volatility
COR vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cencora Inc. (COR) is 7.05%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 27.08%. This indicates that COR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COR | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 27.08% | -20.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.87% | 55.16% | -28.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.25% | 71.89% | -41.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 56.76% | -34.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.49% | 49.36% | -21.87% |
Dividends
COR vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
COR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COR Cencora Inc. | 0.86% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 1.13% | 5.13% | 6.74% | 7.48% | 2.07% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
Financials
COR vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cencora Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COR vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison
COR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
COR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
COR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COR and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for COR and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer