PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COR vs. BDGI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cencora Inc. (COR) and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COR is traded in USD, while BDGI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BDGI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COR achieves a -18.53% return, which is significantly lower than BDGI.TO's 26.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with COR having a 17.00% annualized return and BDGI.TO not far behind at 16.43%.


COR

1D
-0.35%
1M
5.22%
YTD
-18.53%
6M
-18.54%
1Y
-4.43%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
20.49%
10Y*
17.00%

BDGI.TO

1D
5.44%
1M
9.14%
YTD
26.22%
6M
21.04%
1Y
104.65%
3Y*
52.00%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
16.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COR
Cencora Inc.
-18.53%51.48%10.37%25.33%26.26%44.09%23.37%23.51%-17.57%19.51%
BDGI.TO
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
26.22%116.68%-17.29%59.81%-19.27%-14.92%12.95%15.26%11.51%-7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between COR and BDGI.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.12

The correlation between COR and BDGI.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.12 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COR:

$53.55B

BDGI.TO:

CA$3.16B

EPS

COR:

$13.07

BDGI.TO:

CA$2.01

PE Ratio

COR:

20.97

BDGI.TO:

46.56

PEG Ratio

COR:

9.96

BDGI.TO:

1.29

PS Ratio

COR:

0.16

BDGI.TO:

3.31

PB Ratio

COR:

15.76

BDGI.TO:

10.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

COR:

$328.68B

BDGI.TO:

CA$955.05M

Gross Profit (TTM)

COR:

$11.66B

BDGI.TO:

CA$221.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

COR:

$3.64B

BDGI.TO:

CA$178.82M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COR vs. BDGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COR
COR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGI.TO
BDGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cencora Inc. (COR) and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CORBDGI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.49

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

4.02

-4.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

10.86

-11.26

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COR Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the BDGI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COR and BDGI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CORBDGI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

2.91

-3.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.54

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.46

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.65

-0.11

Drawdowns

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COR drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, which is greater than BDGI.TO's maximum drawdown of -64.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COR and BDGI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORBDGI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.01%

-64.68%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.44%

-26.18%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

-34.01%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

-42.44%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.44%

-64.68%

+32.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.57%

0.00%

-26.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-22.48%

+8.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.26%

9.67%

+1.59%

Volatility

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cencora Inc. (COR) is 7.05%, while Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that COR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORBDGI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

8.66%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.87%

30.63%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.25%

36.29%

-6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

34.03%

-11.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.49%

35.67%

-8.18%

Dividends

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Dividend Comparison

COR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than BDGI.TO's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDGI.TO
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
0.81%1.03%2.01%1.69%2.48%1.97%1.57%1.62%1.61%1.55%1.20%1.47%
COR
Cencora Inc.
0.86%0.67%0.93%0.96%1.13%5.13%6.74%7.48%2.07%1.61%1.77%1.17%

Financials

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cencora Inc. and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
78.36B
203.24M
(COR) Total Revenue
(BDGI.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. COR values in USD, BDGI.TO values in CAD

COR vs. BDGI.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cencora Inc. and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
4.6%
24.5%
Portfolio components
COR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.

BDGI.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a gross profit of 49.86M and revenue of 203.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

COR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

BDGI.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported an operating income of 13.08M and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

COR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

BDGI.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a net income of 862.00K and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COR and BDGI.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COR and BDGI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer