COPX vs. QTUM
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COPX returned 18.13%/yr vs 27.81%/yr for QTUM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
COPX vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 44.14% return.
COPX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 93.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 20.76%
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 44.14%
- 6M
- 39.20%
- 1Y
- 80.80%
- 3Y*
- 48.48%
- 5Y*
- 27.81%
- 10Y*
- —
COPX vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 13.23% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -9.41% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 44.14% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and QTUM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between COPX and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
COPX vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPX
QTUM
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
COPX
QTUM
-
Industrials
COPX
QTUM
Communication Services
COPX
-
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
COPX
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
COPX
-
QTUM
-
Energy
COPX
-
QTUM
-
Financial Services
COPX
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
COPX
-
QTUM
Real Estate
COPX
-
QTUM
-
Technology
COPX
-
QTUM
Utilities
COPX
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
QTUM
COPX vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 5.32 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 19.76 | -9.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.94 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.04 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.03 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
COPX vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -38.45% | -44.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -15.26% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -25.39% | -14.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -38.45% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.06% | -6.53% | -8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.28% | -8.25% | -31.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 4.10% | +4.68% |
Volatility
COPX vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 18.19% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 13.41%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.19% | 13.41% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.27% | 22.31% | +14.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.89% | 27.73% | +15.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.80% | 26.85% | +9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.68% | 27.34% | +8.34% |
COPX vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than QTUM's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.36% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.74% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and QTUM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to QTUM (13.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.81% vs 18.13% for COPX. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 13.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.81% return vs 18.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.74% for QTUM.
COPX is categorized as Materials, while QTUM is Technology Equities. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer