COPX vs. CHAT
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. COPX is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, COPX returned 32.33%/yr vs 50.33%/yr for CHAT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
COPX vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 58.75% return.
COPX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 93.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 20.76%
CHAT
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 58.75%
- 6M
- 54.05%
- 1Y
- 117.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 13.23% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 1.99% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 58.75% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and CHAT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.50 |
The correlation between COPX and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
COPX vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPX
CHAT
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
COPX
CHAT
-
Industrials
COPX
CHAT
Communication Services
COPX
-
CHAT
Consumer Cyclical
COPX
-
CHAT
Consumer Defensive
COPX
-
CHAT
-
Energy
COPX
-
CHAT
-
Financial Services
COPX
-
CHAT
Healthcare
COPX
-
CHAT
-
Real Estate
COPX
-
CHAT
-
Technology
COPX
-
CHAT
Utilities
COPX
-
CHAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
CHAT
COPX vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.54 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 7.23 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 21.00 | -10.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 3.63 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.78 | -1.61 |
Drawdowns
COPX vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -31.34% | -51.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -16.28% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -31.34% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.06% | -9.52% | -5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.28% | -5.36% | -33.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 5.60% | +3.18% |
Volatility
COPX vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 18.19% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 15.95%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.19% | 15.95% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.27% | 27.06% | +10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.89% | 32.47% | +10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.80% | 30.45% | +6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.68% | 30.45% | +5.23% |
COPX vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than CHAT's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.80% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.36% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and CHAT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to CHAT (15.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 50.33% vs 32.33% for COPX. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHAT has been the lower-risk option at 15.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 50.33% return vs 32.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.80% for CHAT.
COPX is categorized as Materials, while CHAT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer