COKE vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

COKE (Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.) is a stock, while GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. Over the past year, COKE returned 65.74% vs 41.62% for GSIB. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COKE vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COKE achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's 10.39% return.

COKE

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 65.74%
• 3Y*: 40.58%
• 5Y*: 33.34%
• 10Y*: 31.72%

GSIB

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 41.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COKE vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.	16.99%	22.63%	38.75%	7.99%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	10.39%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between COKE and GSIB is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.07

Return for Risk

COKE vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COKE

COKE Risk / Return Rank: 84
COKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
COKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
COKE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
COKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COKE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 74
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COKE vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COKE	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.41	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	3.35	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.40	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	3.01	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.04	10.59	-2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COKE vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COKE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COKE and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COKE	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.41	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.36	-1.91

Drawdowns

COKE vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COKE drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COKE and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	COKE	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.32%	-17.71%	-36.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.56%	-13.90%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.46%	-1.13%	-16.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.88%	-2.06%	-16.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	3.94%	+4.26%

Volatility

COKE vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 4.58%. This indicates that COKE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COKE	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.58%	4.58%	+6.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.55%	14.13%	+15.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.65%	17.39%	+17.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.49%	18.46%	+19.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.17%	18.46%	+18.71%

Dividends

COKE vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

COKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than GSIB's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.	0.56%	0.65%	1.59%	0.54%	0.20%	0.16%	0.38%	0.35%	0.56%	0.46%	0.56%	0.55%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.73%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COKE and GSIB in my portfolio?

COKE and GSIB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COKE or GSIB?

COKE has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to GSIB (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COKE dropped -54.32% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.