PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COKE vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COKE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COKE achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, COKE has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 31.72%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.


COKE

1D
-0.61%
1M
2.58%
YTD
16.99%
6M
9.02%
1Y
65.74%
3Y*
40.58%
5Y*
33.34%
10Y*
31.72%

GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COKE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
16.99%22.63%38.75%82.92%-17.09%133.24%-5.87%60.74%-17.10%20.94%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between COKE and GLD is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COKE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COKE
COKE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
COKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
COKE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
COKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
COKE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COKE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COKEGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.51

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

3.78

+4.26

COKE vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COKE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COKE and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COKEGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.13

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.98

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Drawdowns

COKE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COKE drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COKE and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COKEGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.32%

-45.56%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.56%

-20.10%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-20.10%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.52%

-21.03%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.71%

-22.00%

-29.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.46%

-19.89%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-16.16%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

8.01%

+0.19%

Volatility

COKE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.68%. This indicates that COKE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COKEGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.58%

5.68%

+4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.55%

23.47%

+6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.65%

26.87%

+7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.49%

18.07%

+19.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.17%

15.99%

+21.18%

Dividends

COKE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

COKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
0.56%0.65%1.59%0.54%0.20%0.16%0.38%0.35%0.56%0.46%0.56%0.55%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COKE and GLD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COKE has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to GLD (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COKE dropped -54.32% vs GLD's -45.56%.

COKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COKE and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer