COIW vs. GLDY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -46.63% vs 11.50% for GLDY. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

COIW vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -35.32% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -4.78% return.

COIW

• 1D: 7.79%
• 1M: -23.46%
• YTD: -35.32%
• 6M: -48.91%
• 1Y: -46.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDY

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -6.85%
• YTD: -4.78%
• 6M: -2.80%
• 1Y: 11.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-35.32%	24.40%
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	-4.78%	15.15%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and GLDY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

COIW vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 5
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GLDY

GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 19
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COIW	GLDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	0.57	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.47	0.78	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.13	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	0.74	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.99	1.98	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COIW vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COIW	GLDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	0.57	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.46	0.42	-0.89

Drawdowns

COIW vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and GLDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	COIW	GLDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.55%	-15.57%	-58.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.55%	-15.57%	-58.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.71%	-15.33%	-55.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.03%	-4.02%	-34.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.34%	5.83%	+41.51%

Volatility

COIW vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 25.57% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.95%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COIW	GLDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.57%	4.95%	+20.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.78%	18.57%	+44.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	85.48%	20.14%	+65.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.27%	19.71%	+71.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.27%	19.71%	+71.56%

COIW vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COIW and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

COIW vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 235.93%, more than GLDY's 48.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	235.93%	120.37%
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	48.51%	37.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COIW and GLDY in my portfolio?

COIW and GLDY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COIW or GLDY?

COIW has higher volatility (25.57%) compared to GLDY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs GLDY's -15.57%.

Which ETF is better, COIW or GLDY?

On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 11.50% vs -46.63% for COIW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COIW or GLDY?

Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 11.50% return vs -46.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COIW or GLDY?

COIW and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COIW or GLDY?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 235.93%, compared with 48.51% for GLDY.

What is the main difference between COIW and GLDY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.