PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COHR vs. PWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COHR vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COHR achieves a 117.77% return, which is significantly higher than PWR's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, COHR has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 35.09%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 40.58% annualized return.


COHR

1D
6.62%
1M
19.89%
YTD
117.77%
6M
116.25%
1Y
404.05%
3Y*
117.79%
5Y*
41.61%
10Y*
35.09%

PWR

1D
-0.19%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
64.46%
6M
49.89%
1Y
92.19%
3Y*
56.18%
5Y*
49.77%
10Y*
40.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COHR vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
117.77%94.84%117.62%24.02%-48.63%-10.04%125.60%3.73%-30.86%58.35%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
64.46%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between COHR and PWR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 1998

0.35

The correlation between COHR and PWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

COHR:

$1.64K

PWR:

$7.29

PE Ratio

COHR:

0.24

PWR:

95.17

PEG Ratio

COHR:

0.04

PWR:

4.72

PS Ratio

COHR:

0.03

PWR:

3.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

COHR:

$1.81T

PWR:

$29.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COHR:

$1.76B

PWR:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

COHR:

$960.76M

PWR:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COHR vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COHR
COHR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
COHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
COHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COHR vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COHRPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.43

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.36

7.45

+7.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.88

17.97

+24.91

COHR vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COHR Sharpe Ratio is 5.62, which is higher than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COHR and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COHRPWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62

2.55

+3.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.41

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

1.21

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.35

-0.03

Drawdowns

COHR vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COHR drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHR and PWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COHRPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-97.07%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.52%

-12.45%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.85%

-33.89%

-20.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.87%

-33.89%

-28.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.22%

-45.53%

-26.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-11.64%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-46.86%

+11.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.48%

5.15%

+4.33%

Volatility

COHR vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Coherent, Inc. (COHR) has a higher volatility of 28.41% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 11.16%. This indicates that COHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COHRPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.41%

11.16%

+17.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.90%

29.60%

+26.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.65%

36.37%

+36.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.36%

35.62%

+25.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.43%

33.70%

+22.73%

Dividends

COHR vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

COHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%

Financials

COHR vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coherent, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
1.81T
7.87B
(COHR) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COHR vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coherent, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
14.1%
Portfolio components
COHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.81T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

COHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.81T, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

COHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported a net income of 191.40B and revenue of 1.81T, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COHR and PWR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COHR has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to PWR (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COHR dropped -80.89% vs PWR's -97.07%.

COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.62 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COHR and PWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer