CNXC vs. PZG
CNXC (Concentrix Corporation) and PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) are both stocks. CNXC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CNXC returned -27.31%/yr vs 2.58%/yr for PZG. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNXC vs. PZG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXC achieves a -32.63% return, which is significantly lower than PZG's -7.14% return.
CNXC
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- -32.63%
- 6M
- -26.68%
- 1Y
- -49.86%
- 3Y*
- -29.25%
- 5Y*
- -27.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PZG
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 103.90%
- 3Y*
- 59.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
CNXC vs. PZG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | -32.63% | -1.39% | -55.03% | -25.36% | -24.91% | 81.22% | 23.37% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -7.14% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 17.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXC and PZG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
CNXC:
$1.68B
PZG:
$97.27M
CNXC:
-$21.33
PZG:
-$0.09
CNXC:
0.60
PZG:
2.75
CNXC:
$9.95B
PZG:
$0.00
CNXC:
$3.27B
PZG:
-$892.14K
CNXC:
-$944.68M
PZG:
-$11.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXC vs. PZG — Risk / Return Rank
CNXC
PZG
CNXC vs. PZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNXC | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.86 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 4.65 | -5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNXC | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 | 1.44 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 | 0.04 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | -0.09 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
CNXC vs. PZG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXC drawdown since its inception was -87.86%, smaller than the maximum PZG drawdown of -93.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXC and PZG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXC | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.86% | -93.81% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.71% | -56.18% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.50% | -56.18% | -20.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.86% | -74.05% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.48% | -73.53% | -11.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.65% | -68.57% | +20.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.32% | 22.43% | +14.89% |
Volatility
CNXC vs. PZG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) is 15.12%, while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a volatility of 19.29%. This indicates that CNXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXC | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.12% | 19.29% | -4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.98% | 58.36% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.40% | 72.88% | -11.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.26% | 62.90% | -14.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.78% | 60.72% | -10.94% |
Dividends
CNXC vs. PZG - Dividend Comparison
CNXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, while PZG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | 5.16% | 3.27% | 2.87% | 1.15% | 0.77% | 0.14% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CNXC vs. PZG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Concentrix Corporation and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXC and PZG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to CNXC (15.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXC dropped -87.86% vs PZG's -93.81%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNXC and PZG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer