CNSWF vs. CRM
CNSWF (Constellation Software Inc) and CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, CNSWF returned 18.35%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for CRM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNSWF vs. CRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNSWF achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CNSWF has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 18.35%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.
CNSWF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 13.17%
- YTD
- -11.52%
- 6M
- -11.81%
- 1Y
- -40.43%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
CRM
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -30.92%
- 6M
- -29.37%
- 1Y
- -33.00%
- 3Y*
- -4.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
CNSWF vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc | -11.52% | -22.46% | 24.90% | 59.77% | -15.99% | 43.09% | 34.48% | 53.34% | 6.04% | 33.51% |
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | -30.92% | -20.25% | 27.76% | 98.46% | -47.83% | 14.20% | 36.82% | 18.74% | 33.98% | 49.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNSWF and CRM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2007 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CNSWF and CRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNSWF:
$44.97B
CRM:
$159.00B
CNSWF:
$34.82
CRM:
$8.59
CNSWF:
60.95
CRM:
21.25
CNSWF:
3.23
CRM:
0.04
CNSWF:
3.71
CRM:
3.98
CNSWF:
11.54
CRM:
4.64
CNSWF:
$12.11B
CRM:
$42.83B
CNSWF:
$4.15B
CRM:
$33.25B
CNSWF:
$2.77B
CRM:
$12.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNSWF vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank
CNSWF
CRM
CNSWF vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNSWF | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.84 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -1.62 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNSWF | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 | -0.88 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.13 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.24 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.45 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
CNSWF vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNSWF drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNSWF and CRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNSWF | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -70.50% | +15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.12% | -39.36% | -15.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.25% | -54.70% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.25% | -58.62% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.25% | -58.62% | +3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.73% | -49.87% | +7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -16.12% | +9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.19% | 20.48% | +15.71% |
Volatility
CNSWF vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) is 13.34%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that CNSWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNSWF | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | 16.96% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.23% | 31.74% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.92% | 37.87% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 37.02% | -7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 35.36% | -6.50% |
Dividends
CNSWF vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison
CNSWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than CRM's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.13% | 0.16% | 0.26% | 0.22% | 0.41% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.76% | 0.96% |
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 0.92% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CNSWF vs. CRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNSWF vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison
CNSWF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a gross profit of 733.69M and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
CRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
CNSWF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported an operating income of 452.64M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
CRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
CNSWF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a net income of 361.92M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
CRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNSWF and CRM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRM has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to CNSWF (13.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNSWF dropped -55.25% vs CRM's -70.50%.
CRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNSWF and CRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer