CNDX.L vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
CNDX.L and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both CNDX.L and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNDX.L or VTI.
Key characteristics
CNDX.L | VTI | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 1.77% | 3.74% |
1Y Return | 32.38% | 21.57% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 8.09% | 6.28% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 18.01% | 12.38% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 17.57% | 11.62% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.07 | 1.72 |
Daily Std Dev | 15.65% | 12.11% |
Max Drawdown | -35.21% | -55.45% |
Current Drawdown | -6.89% | -5.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.L and VTI is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNDX.L vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNDX.L achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.L has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 17.57%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNDX.L vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNDX.L vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNDX.L vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
CNDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VTI's 1.44% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 1.16% | 0.16% |
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.44% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
CNDX.L vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.L and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNDX.L vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.19%. This indicates that CNDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.