CNC vs. META
CNC (Centene Corporation) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. CNC operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, CNC returned 6.71%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for META. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNC vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNC achieves a 58.03% return, which is significantly higher than META's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CNC has underperformed META with an annualized return of 6.71%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.
CNC
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- 16.21%
- YTD
- 58.03%
- 6M
- 71.67%
- 1Y
- 17.89%
- 3Y*
- -1.96%
- 5Y*
- -1.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
META
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- -11.24%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- -15.84%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
CNC vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNC Centene Corporation | 58.03% | -32.07% | -18.37% | -9.51% | -0.47% | 37.26% | -4.52% | 9.05% | 14.29% | 78.52% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -11.24% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNC and META is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CNC and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNC:
$32.23B
META:
$1.50T
CNC:
-$13.07
META:
$27.47
CNC:
0.16
META:
7.00
CNC:
1.50
META:
6.16
CNC:
$198.10B
META:
$214.96B
CNC:
$29.57B
META:
$176.14B
CNC:
-$5.11B
META:
$106.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNC vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
CNC
META
CNC vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centene Corporation (CNC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.94 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.48 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | -1.01 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | -0.45 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.28 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.46 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
CNC vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNC drawdown since its inception was -74.07%, roughly equal to the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNC and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.07% | -76.74% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.50% | -33.30% | -22.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.65% | -34.15% | -34.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.07% | -76.74% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.07% | -76.74% | +2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.11% | -25.73% | -7.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -15.26% | -6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.84% | 15.69% | +18.15% |
Volatility
CNC vs. META - Volatility Comparison
Centene Corporation (CNC) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.48%. This indicates that CNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.25% | 10.48% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 26.95% | +9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.57% | 35.56% | +29.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.51% | 44.05% | -4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.53% | 38.69% | -0.16% |
Dividends
CNC vs. META - Dividend Comparison
CNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CNC Centene Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Financials
CNC vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centene Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNC vs. META - Profitability Comparison
CNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centene Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.94B and revenue of 49.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
CNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centene Corporation reported an operating income of 1.86B and revenue of 49.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
CNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centene Corporation reported a net income of 1.54B and revenue of 49.94B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNC and META have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNC has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to META (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNC dropped -74.07% vs META's -76.74%.
CNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNC and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer