CMOD.L vs. UNH
CMOD.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity TR Index, while UNH (UnitedHealth Group Incorporated) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CMOD.L returned 10.42%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for UNH. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMOD.L vs. UNH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMOD.L achieves a 22.33% return, which is significantly lower than UNH's 24.12% return.
CMOD.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 22.33%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- —
UNH
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 24.12%
- 6M
- 26.61%
- 1Y
- 37.87%
- 3Y*
- -4.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
CMOD.L vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF | 22.33% | 16.16% | 4.12% | -7.56% | 14.50% | 27.35% | -3.87% | 6.64% | -10.22% | 2.08% |
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 24.12% | -33.14% | -2.41% | 0.80% | 6.94% | 45.20% | 21.25% | 20.00% | 14.52% | 37.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMOD.L and UNH is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2017 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMOD.L vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank
CMOD.L
UNH
CMOD.L vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMOD.L | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.22 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 1.31 | +3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | 2.88 | +7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMOD.L | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.95 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.06 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
CMOD.L vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMOD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.16%, smaller than the maximum UNH drawdown of -74.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMOD.L and UNH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMOD.L | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.16% | -74.37% | +41.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -28.96% | +21.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.65% | -61.39% | +49.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -61.39% | +34.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.23% | -32.60% | +25.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -14.76% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 13.19% | -9.98% |
Volatility
CMOD.L vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) is 5.26%, while UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that CMOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMOD.L | UNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 8.29% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.05% | 30.87% | -15.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 40.17% | -23.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 31.87% | -15.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.68% | 30.19% | -15.51% |
Dividends
CMOD.L vs. UNH - Dividend Comparison
CMOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 2.17% | 2.64% | 1.62% | 1.38% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMOD.L and UNH have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CMOD.L and UNH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer