CMOD.L vs. JNJ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CMOD.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity TR Index, while JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CMOD.L returned 10.42%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CMOD.L vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMOD.L achieves a 22.33% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 13.43% return.

CMOD.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 22.33%
• 6M: 22.42%
• 1Y: 33.62%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: —

JNJ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 5.50%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 53.49%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 10.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMOD.L vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	22.33%	16.16%	4.12%	-7.56%	14.50%	27.35%	-3.87%	6.64%	-10.22%	2.08%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	13.43%	47.48%	-4.81%	-8.58%	5.97%	11.44%	10.82%	16.22%	-5.13%	23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CMOD.L and JNJ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2017	0.02

Return for Risk

CMOD.L vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMOD.L

CMOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CMOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CMOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CMOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CMOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

JNJ

JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMOD.L vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMOD.L	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	3.19	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	4.65	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.57	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	4.91	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.43	14.52	-4.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMOD.L vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMOD.L and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMOD.L	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	3.19	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.60	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.54	-0.07

Drawdowns

CMOD.L vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMOD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.16%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMOD.L and JNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMOD.L	JNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.16%	-50.67%	+17.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-10.96%	+3.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.65%	-15.95%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.86%	-18.41%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.23%	-6.06%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.25%	-11.88%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	3.70%	-0.49%

Volatility

CMOD.L vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) is 5.26%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that CMOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMOD.L	JNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	5.80%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.05%	12.41%	+2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.91%	16.87%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.60%	16.87%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	18.47%	-3.79%

Dividends

CMOD.L vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

CMOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	2.26%	2.48%	3.40%	3.00%	2.52%	2.45%	2.53%	2.57%	2.74%	2.38%	2.73%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMOD.L and JNJ in my portfolio?

CMOD.L and JNJ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.