CMOD.L vs. DBA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CMOD.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF) and DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CMOD.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity TR Index, while DBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMOD.L returned 10.42%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for DBA. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMOD.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for DBA.

Performance

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMOD.L achieves a 22.33% return, which is significantly higher than DBA's 3.17% return.

CMOD.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 22.33%
• 6M: 22.42%
• 1Y: 33.62%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: —

DBA

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 3.17%
• 6M: 3.33%
• 1Y: -0.73%
• 3Y*: 11.90%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	22.33%	16.16%	4.12%	-7.56%	14.50%	27.35%	-3.87%	6.64%	-10.22%	2.08%
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund	3.17%	-0.56%	33.45%	7.64%	2.53%	22.37%	-2.54%	-0.71%	-8.74%	-7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CMOD.L and DBA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2017	0.41

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CMOD.L	DBA
Basic Materials	35.8%	10.7%
Financial Services	17.8%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	11.8%
Communication Services	12.3%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	9.7%	8.8%
Real Estate	5.8%	1.1%
Technology	5.6%	6.3%
Energy	-	5.3%
Healthcare	-	16.8%
Industrials	-	15.2%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

CMOD.L vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMOD.L

CMOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CMOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CMOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CMOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CMOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

DBA

DBA Risk / Return Rank: 8
DBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DBA Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DBA Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMOD.L	DBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	-0.07	+2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	-0.02	+2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.00	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	-0.09	+4.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.43	-0.18	+10.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the DBA Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMOD.L and DBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMOD.L	DBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	-0.07	+2.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.67	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.07	+0.40

Drawdowns

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMOD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.16%, smaller than the maximum DBA drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMOD.L and DBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMOD.L	DBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.16%	-67.97%	+34.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-8.35%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.65%	-12.36%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.86%	-15.94%	-10.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.23%	-27.37%	+20.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.25%	-41.10%	+28.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	4.16%	-0.95%

Volatility

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 4.09%. This indicates that CMOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMOD.L	DBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	4.09%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.05%	6.58%	+8.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.91%	10.73%	+6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.60%	14.09%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	13.07%	+1.61%

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMOD.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMOD.L vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison

CMOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund	3.47%	3.58%	4.08%	4.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	1.55%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMOD.L and DBA in my portfolio?

CMOD.L and DBA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMOD.L or DBA?

On fees, CMOD.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMOD.L or DBA?

CMOD.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DBA.

What is the main difference between CMOD.L and DBA?

CMOD.L is categorized as Commodities, while DBA is Agricultural Commodities. CMOD.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity TR Index, while DBA tracks DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for CMOD.L and 0.94% for DBA.