PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCL vs. PL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMCL vs. PL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCL achieves a -23.85% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 66.02% return.


CMCL

1D
-1.30%
1M
-17.18%
YTD
-23.85%
6M
-17.45%
1Y
8.42%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*

PL

1D
1.61%
1M
-16.14%
YTD
66.02%
6M
152.82%
1Y
460.62%
3Y*
112.54%
5Y*
26.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCL vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
-23.85%186.75%-18.90%2.65%11.39%-15.31%
PL
Planet Labs PBC
66.02%388.12%63.56%-43.22%-29.27%-37.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCL and PL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2021

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMCL:

$390.18M

PL:

$11.31B

EPS

CMCL:

$3.15

PL:

-$1.17

PS Ratio

CMCL:

1.42

PL:

31.13

PB Ratio

CMCL:

1.44

PL:

25.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMCL:

$274.16M

PL:

$335.61M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMCL:

$142.30M

PL:

$186.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

CMCL:

$137.13M

PL:

-$125.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMCL vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCL
CMCL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CMCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PL
PL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCL vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCLPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.55

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

12.45

-12.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

38.43

-38.08

CMCL vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the PL Sharpe Ratio of 4.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCL and PL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCLPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

4.57

-4.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.34

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.33

0.00

Drawdowns

CMCL vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCL drawdown since its inception was -65.77%, smaller than the maximum PL drawdown of -85.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCL and PL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCLPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.77%

-85.73%

+19.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.89%

-37.32%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.89%

-55.17%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.00%

-85.73%

+35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.89%

-36.30%

-10.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.78%

-49.97%

+14.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.39%

12.07%

+12.32%

Volatility

CMCL vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) is 13.82%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 39.05%. This indicates that CMCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMCLPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.82%

39.05%

-25.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.23%

77.24%

-30.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.15%

101.84%

-36.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.69%

80.73%

-28.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.58%

79.79%

-25.21%

Dividends

CMCL vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

CMCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while PL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
2.84%2.14%5.95%4.59%4.52%4.29%2.11%3.27%5.23%1.86%
PL
Planet Labs PBC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CMCL vs. PL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc and Planet Labs PBC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00M80.00M90.00M20222023202420252026
66.43M
94.15M
(CMCL) Total Revenue
(PL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CMCL and PL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PL has higher volatility (39.05%) compared to CMCL (13.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCL dropped -65.77% vs PL's -85.73%.

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMCL and PL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer