PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CM.TO vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CM.TO (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) is a stock, while XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) is Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. Over the past 10 years, CM.TO returned 20.73%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for XIU.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CM.TO achieves a 23.94% return, which is significantly higher than XIU.TO's 9.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CM.TO has outperformed XIU.TO with an annualized return of 20.73%, while XIU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.

CM.TO

1D
0.71%
1M
1.58%
YTD
23.94%
6M
24.38%
1Y
68.16%
3Y*
45.63%
5Y*
22.94%
10Y*
20.73%

XIU.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
2.33%
YTD
9.69%
6M
11.69%
1Y
31.18%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce		23.94%42.31%49.56%23.83%-20.89%47.75%13.88%18.19%-8.64%22.50%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		9.69%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CM.TO and XIU.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2006

0.62

The correlation between CM.TO and XIU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

Often compared with CM.TO:
CM.TO vs. RY.TOCM.TO vs. BMO.TOCM.TO vs. BNS.TOCM.TO vs. TD.TOCM.TO vs. CMCM.TO vs. EQB.TOCM.TO vs. NA.TO
Often compared with XIU.TO:
XIU.TO vs. XIC.TOXIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXIU.TO vs. XSP.TOXIU.TO vs. HXT.TOXIU.TO vs. SPYXIU.TO vs. XIT.TO

Return for Risk

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CM.TO
CM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CM.TOXIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.92
2.62

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.79
3.49

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.47

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.52

4.09

+3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.92

18.93

+8.99

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CM.TO and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CM.TOXIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

2.62

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

1.12

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.85

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.55

+0.19

Drawdowns

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CM.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.49%, which is greater than XIU.TO's maximum drawdown of -46.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM.TO and XIU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CM.TOXIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.49%

-46.98%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-7.65%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-12.36%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.43%

-16.36%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

-35.46%

-4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-1.68%

-3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-6.85%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.65%

+0.80%

Volatility

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) at 3.96%. This indicates that CM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CM.TOXIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

3.96%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

9.56%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

11.97%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

12.82%

+5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

15.02%

+4.90%

Dividends

CM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

CM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than XIU.TO's 2.21% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce		2.67%3.20%4.04%5.47%7.52%8.13%10.74%10.51%10.58%8.39%8.84%9.69%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.21%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

CM.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CM.TO and XIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer