PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CM.TO vs. ARTG.V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) and Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CM.TO achieves a 23.94% return, which is significantly higher than ARTG.V's -16.76% return.


CM.TO

1D
0.71%
1M
1.58%
YTD
23.94%
6M
24.38%
1Y
68.16%
3Y*
45.63%
5Y*
22.94%
10Y*
20.73%

ARTG.V

1D
0.43%
1M
-10.62%
YTD
-16.76%
6M
-13.97%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
85.30%
5Y*
36.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
23.94%42.31%49.56%23.83%-20.89%47.75%13.88%2.02%
ARTG.V
Artemis Gold Inc
-16.76%166.84%117.56%43.96%-36.38%7.81%392.31%18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CM.TO and ARTG.V is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CM.TO:

CA$141.37B

ARTG.V:

CA$7.32B

EPS

CM.TO:

CA$10.53

ARTG.V:

CA$1.93

PE Ratio

CM.TO:

14.52

ARTG.V:

15.85

PEG Ratio

CM.TO:

1.79

ARTG.V:

0.01

PS Ratio

CM.TO:

2.68

ARTG.V:

6.12

PB Ratio

CM.TO:

2.42

ARTG.V:

6.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

CM.TO:

CA$53.25B

ARTG.V:

CA$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CM.TO:

CA$28.73B

ARTG.V:

CA$857.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

CM.TO:

CA$13.01B

ARTG.V:

CA$857.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CM.TO
CM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ARTG.V
ARTG.V Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) and Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CM.TOARTG.VDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.09

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.52

0.42

+7.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.92

1.05

+26.86

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CM.TO and ARTG.V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CM.TOARTG.VDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

0.30

+3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

0.71

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.13

-0.39

Drawdowns

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CM.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.49%, which is greater than ARTG.V's maximum drawdown of -54.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM.TO and ARTG.V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CM.TOARTG.VDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.49%

-54.31%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-34.59%

+25.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-34.59%

+18.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.43%

-54.31%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-34.31%

+29.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-17.34%

+8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

13.64%

-11.19%

Volatility

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) is 7.78%, while Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V) has a volatility of 13.91%. This indicates that CM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARTG.V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CM.TOARTG.VDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

13.91%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

36.91%

-22.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

47.84%

-30.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

51.19%

-32.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

59.50%

-39.58%

Dividends

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Dividend Comparison

CM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while ARTG.V has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARTG.V
Artemis Gold Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.67%3.20%4.04%5.47%7.52%8.13%10.74%10.51%10.58%8.39%8.84%9.69%

Financials

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Artemis Gold Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
15.23B
315.38M
(CM.TO) Total Revenue
(ARTG.V) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

CM.TO vs. ARTG.V - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Artemis Gold Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
48.4%
69.6%
Portfolio components
CM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

ARTG.V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported a gross profit of 219.36M and revenue of 315.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

CM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

ARTG.V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported an operating income of 213.14M and revenue of 315.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

CM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.

ARTG.V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported a net income of 114.20M and revenue of 315.38M, resulting in a net margin of 36.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CM.TO and ARTG.V have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CM.TO and ARTG.V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer