CLS vs. QBR-B.TO
CLS (Celestica Inc.) and QBR-B.TO (Quebecor Inc) are both stocks. CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while QBR-B.TO operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, CLS returned 43.16%/yr vs 15.72%/yr for QBR-B.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLS is traded in USD, while QBR-B.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QBR-B.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLS having a 30.75% return and QBR-B.TO slightly lower at 30.16%. Over the past 10 years, CLS has outperformed QBR-B.TO with an annualized return of 43.16%, while QBR-B.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.72% annualized return.
CLS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 30.75%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 220.14%
- 3Y*
- 209.55%
- 5Y*
- 114.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.16%
QBR-B.TO
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 17.36%
- YTD
- 30.16%
- 6M
- 33.17%
- 1Y
- 74.20%
- 3Y*
- 30.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 30.75% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
QBR-B.TO Quebecor Inc | 30.16% | 77.98% | -3.97% | 11.08% | 3.73% | -9.70% | 3.88% | 21.76% | 12.69% | 37.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS and QBR-B.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.17 |
The correlation between CLS and QBR-B.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLS:
$44.72B
QBR-B.TO:
CA$15.65B
CLS:
$8.28
QBR-B.TO:
CA$3.85
CLS:
46.65
QBR-B.TO:
17.58
CLS:
0.63
QBR-B.TO:
1.47
CLS:
3.24
QBR-B.TO:
2.73
CLS:
21.31
QBR-B.TO:
5.84
CLS:
$13.81B
QBR-B.TO:
CA$5.73B
CLS:
$1.60B
QBR-B.TO:
CA$2.22B
CLS:
$1.32B
QBR-B.TO:
CA$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLS
QBR-B.TO
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Quebecor Inc (QBR-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLS | QBR-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.52 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.58 | 6.21 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.88 | 21.12 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLS | QBR-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | 3.07 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.01 | 0.75 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.72 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than QBR-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and QBR-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS | QBR-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.93% | -74.00% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.24% | -12.00% | -17.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.96% | -21.14% | -32.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | -32.29% | -21.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.60% | -36.76% | -43.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.18% | -4.25% | -13.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.36% | -12.80% | -60.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.72% | 3.53% | +8.19% |
Volatility
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 26.60% compared to Quebecor Inc (QBR-B.TO) at 10.46%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBR-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS | QBR-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.60% | 10.46% | +16.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.08% | 18.04% | +37.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.52% | 24.38% | +48.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.62% | 22.62% | +35.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.93% | 21.94% | +27.99% |
Dividends
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBR-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBR-B.TO Quebecor Inc | 2.22% | 2.71% | 4.13% | 3.81% | 3.97% | 3.85% | 2.44% | 1.18% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.91% | 0.77% |
Financials
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Quebecor Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLS vs. QBR-B.TO - Profitability Comparison
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
QBR-B.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a gross profit of 608.10M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
QBR-B.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported an operating income of 367.20M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
QBR-B.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a net income of 225.40M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS and QBR-B.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CLS and QBR-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer