PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLILF vs. MTSFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLILF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than MTSFY's -18.54% return.


CLILF

1D
0.00%
1M
-12.44%
YTD
6.49%
6M
33.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
-5.22%
5Y*
10Y*

MTSFY

1D
1.35%
1M
-12.94%
YTD
-18.54%
6M
-19.49%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
6.49%-3.06%-1.09%-23.92%6.00%-1.96%
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
-18.54%43.82%-0.71%34.87%-7.78%-14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CLILF and MTSFY is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLILF:

$7.72B

MTSFY:

$25.18B

EPS

CLILF:

$0.05

MTSFY:

$306.23

PE Ratio

CLILF:

40.59

MTSFY:

0.09

PS Ratio

CLILF:

3.06

MTSFY:

0.01

PB Ratio

CLILF:

0.61

MTSFY:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLILF:

$2.91B

MTSFY:

$2.74T

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLILF:

$2.22B

MTSFY:

$604.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLILF:

$153.89M

MTSFY:

$547.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLILF vs. MTSFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MTSFY
MTSFY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MTSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLILFMTSFYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.01

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

-0.08

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.05

-0.20

+1.26

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLILF Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the MTSFY Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLILF and MTSFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLILFMTSFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

-0.08

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.12

-0.17

Drawdowns

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLILF drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, which is greater than MTSFY's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLILF and MTSFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLILFMTSFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-52.08%

-13.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.26%

-34.56%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.96%

-34.56%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.74%

-33.68%

-20.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-19.93%

-24.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.34%

12.95%

+1.39%

Volatility

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) is 10.69%, while Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) has a volatility of 13.86%. This indicates that CLILF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLILFMTSFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

13.86%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.59%

24.57%

+30.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.88%

31.22%

+31.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.06%

29.63%

+50.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.06%

33.72%

+46.34%

Dividends

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Dividend Comparison

CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while MTSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
3.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
0.00%0.98%1.26%0.98%

Financials

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T20222023202420252026
1.15B
741.27B
(CLILF) Total Revenue
(MTSFY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLILF vs. MTSFY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
18.0%
Portfolio components
CLILF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

MTSFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 133.63B and revenue of 741.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.

CLILF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

MTSFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 96.91B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

CLILF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.

MTSFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 59.90B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLILF and MTSFY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTSFY has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to CLILF (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLILF dropped -66.07% vs MTSFY's -52.08%.

CLILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLILF and MTSFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer