CLF vs. SIRI
CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) and SIRI (Sirius XM Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. CLF operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while SIRI operates in Broadcasting (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, CLF returned 10.01%/yr vs -1.34%/yr for SIRI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLF vs. SIRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly lower than SIRI's 40.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has outperformed SIRI with an annualized return of 10.01%, while SIRI has yielded a comparatively lower -1.34% annualized return.
CLF
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 66.84%
- 3Y*
- -7.46%
- 5Y*
- -11.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
SIRI
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 40.39%
- 6M
- 29.18%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- -6.89%
- 5Y*
- -13.63%
- 10Y*
- -1.34%
CLF vs. SIRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | -4.52% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 77.38% | 12.72% | 6.66% | -14.27% |
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc. | 40.39% | -7.97% | -56.93% | -4.27% | -3.21% | 0.74% | -10.11% | 26.24% | 7.28% | 21.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLF and SIRI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1994 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
CLF:
$7.16B
SIRI:
$9.27B
CLF:
-$2.37
SIRI:
$2.41
CLF:
0.34
SIRI:
1.12
CLF:
1.23
SIRI:
0.79
CLF:
$18.90B
SIRI:
$8.58B
CLF:
-$528.00M
SIRI:
$4.10B
CLF:
$134.00M
SIRI:
$1.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLF vs. SIRI — Risk / Return Rank
CLF
SIRI
CLF vs. SIRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLF | SIRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.78 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 3.51 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLF | SIRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.87 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | -0.30 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | -0.04 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.01 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CLF vs. SIRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, roughly equal to the maximum SIRI drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and SIRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLF | SIRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.78% | -99.92% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.67% | -17.44% | -34.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.46% | -73.87% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.37% | -73.87% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.37% | -73.87% | -8.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.07% | -94.76% | +7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.61% | -80.54% | +32.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.01% | 8.83% | +16.18% |
Volatility
CLF vs. SIRI - Volatility Comparison
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) at 10.37%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLF | SIRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.72% | 10.37% | +10.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.41% | 23.99% | +22.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.41% | 35.66% | +32.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.53% | 44.95% | +14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.05% | 37.69% | +24.36% |
Dividends
CLF vs. SIRI - Dividend Comparison
CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc. | 3.94% | 5.40% | 4.68% | 1.81% | 5.82% | 1.04% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.22% |
Financials
CLF vs. SIRI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and Sirius XM Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLF vs. SIRI - Profitability Comparison
CLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a gross profit of -82.00M and revenue of 4.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.
SIRI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.
CLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported an operating income of -207.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.
SIRI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 454.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
CLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a net income of -237.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.
SIRI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 245.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLF and SIRI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLF has higher volatility (20.72%) compared to SIRI (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLF dropped -98.78% vs SIRI's -99.92%.
CLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLF and SIRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer