CLF vs. PLUG
CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) and PLUG (Plug Power Inc.) are both stocks. CLF operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while PLUG operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CLF returned 10.01%/yr vs 5.89%/yr for PLUG. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLF vs. PLUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly lower than PLUG's 61.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has outperformed PLUG with an annualized return of 10.01%, while PLUG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.89% annualized return.
CLF
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 66.84%
- 3Y*
- -7.46%
- 5Y*
- -11.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
PLUG
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 61.93%
- 6M
- 47.69%
- 1Y
- 229.14%
- 3Y*
- -29.67%
- 5Y*
- -37.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.89%
CLF vs. PLUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | -4.52% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 77.38% | 12.72% | 6.66% | -14.27% |
PLUG Plug Power Inc. | 61.93% | -7.51% | -52.67% | -63.62% | -56.18% | -16.75% | 973.10% | 154.84% | -47.46% | 96.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLF and PLUG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1999 | 0.25 |
The correlation between CLF and PLUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLF:
$7.16B
PLUG:
$4.43B
CLF:
-$2.37
PLUG:
-$1.39
CLF:
0.34
PLUG:
5.21
CLF:
1.23
PLUG:
5.91
CLF:
$18.90B
PLUG:
$739.76M
CLF:
-$528.00M
PLUG:
-$189.79M
CLF:
$134.00M
PLUG:
-$745.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLF vs. PLUG — Risk / Return Rank
CLF
PLUG
CLF vs. PLUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLF | PLUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 4.07 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 6.93 | -4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLF | PLUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.08 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | -0.39 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.07 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.14 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
CLF vs. PLUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, roughly equal to the maximum PLUG drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and PLUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLF | PLUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.78% | -99.99% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.67% | -56.66% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.46% | -94.69% | +20.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.37% | -98.43% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.37% | -99.04% | +16.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.07% | -99.79% | +12.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.61% | -96.23% | +48.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.01% | 33.23% | -8.22% |
Volatility
CLF vs. PLUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) is 20.72%, while Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) has a volatility of 30.53%. This indicates that CLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLF | PLUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.72% | 30.53% | -9.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.41% | 63.42% | -17.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.41% | 111.05% | -42.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.53% | 94.50% | -34.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.05% | 89.47% | -27.42% |
Dividends
CLF vs. PLUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLF nor PLUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% |
PLUG Plug Power Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CLF vs. PLUG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and Plug Power Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CLF and PLUG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLUG has higher volatility (30.53%) compared to CLF (20.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLF dropped -98.78% vs PLUG's -99.99%.
PLUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLF and PLUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer