CL vs. FNX.L
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and FNX.L (Fonix Mobile plc) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while FNX.L operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, CL returned 3.26%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FNX.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. FNX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CL is traded in USD, while FNX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FNX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than FNX.L's -13.56% return.
CL
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.21%
FNX.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -16.86%
- YTD
- -13.56%
- 6M
- -23.97%
- 1Y
- -33.12%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CL vs. FNX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 10.27% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 7.79% |
FNX.L Fonix Mobile plc | -13.56% | -11.75% | -11.16% | 25.54% | 21.09% | 21.89% | 62.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and FNX.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
CL:
$69.29B
FNX.L:
£143.60M
CL:
$2.58
FNX.L:
£0.22
CL:
33.37
FNX.L:
6.46
CL:
8.62
FNX.L:
0.38
CL:
3.35
FNX.L:
0.95
CL:
477.90
FNX.L:
13.21
CL:
$20.80B
FNX.L:
£151.55M
CL:
$12.49B
FNX.L:
£35.81M
CL:
$3.92B
FNX.L:
£30.49M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. FNX.L — Risk / Return Rank
CL
FNX.L
CL vs. FNX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CL | FNX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.85 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.93 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | -1.64 | +1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CL | FNX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | -0.90 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.02 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.35 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
CL vs. FNX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than FNX.L's maximum drawdown of -40.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and FNX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | FNX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -40.38% | -18.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -35.64% | +17.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -40.38% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -40.38% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.54% | -40.05% | +22.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -14.93% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.29% | 20.13% | -8.84% |
Volatility
CL vs. FNX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 7.77%, while Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | FNX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 9.40% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 30.87% | -13.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 36.82% | -15.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 38.05% | -19.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 38.83% | -19.09% |
Dividends
CL vs. FNX.L - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than FNX.L's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.43% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
FNX.L Fonix Mobile plc | 6.25% | 7.00% | 3.81% | 2.90% | 2.99% | 3.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CL vs. FNX.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Fonix Mobile plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. FNX.L - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
FNX.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fonix Mobile plc reported a gross profit of 9.94M and revenue of 42.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
FNX.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fonix Mobile plc reported an operating income of 7.63M and revenue of 42.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
FNX.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fonix Mobile plc reported a net income of 6.11M and revenue of 42.33M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and FNX.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CL and FNX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer